Two Memorial Project Commission members quit over the Project’s bad behavior
Two Pennsylvanian’s quit the Flight 93 Memorial Commission last
week, protesting Park Service plans to condemn five crash-site
properties that it never negotiated for in good faith. Consider the case of
the Lambert family, who have been on their land for three
“It’s absolutely a surprise. I’m shocked by it. I’m
disappointed by it,” said Tim Lambert, who owns nearly 164 acres that his
grandfather bought in the 1930s. The park service plans to condemn two
parcels totaling about five acres – land, he said, he had always intended to
donate for the memorial.
“To the best of my knowledge and my lawyer, absolutely no negotiations have
taken place with the park service where we’ve sat down and discussed this,”
Lambert said he had mainly dealt with the Families of Flight 93 and said
he’s provided the group all the information it’s asked for, including an
They are condemning land that he was trying to GIVE
to them, just because he had the gall to expect the Park Service to actually
do its part.
Project members have embraced the “absolute moral authority”
How dare anyone not rush to give these grieving 9/11 family members whatever
they want? Didn’t they hear Maureen Dowd’s proclamationLouis Nacke, told the press:
That land has been paid for with
40 lives … the donation box is an insult to that cost.
Svonavec insisted that the Park Service follow its own legally required
procedures for assessing property values (procedures that, as it happens,
take into account current property values, not just pre-crash property
values), White accused Svonavec of trying to profit from the blood of his
“I think Svonavec believes his land, because it has the
blood of my cousin and 39 other people, it’s worth more,” he
Using the flag of victim-hood to defend Paul Murdoch’s terrorist
Project members use the same trick to deflect criticism of the giant
Islamic-shaped crescent that is now being built on the crash-site. When
people point out the hidden terrorist memorializing features-things that no
one knew about when the Crescent of Embrace design was chosen-like the Mecca
-orientation of the giant crescent, or the 44 glass
blocks emplaced along the flight path, Project members not only deny
these easy to verify facts, but they pretend that they are being accused of
intending to honor the terrorists:
“That’s an absolute,
unequivocal fabrication that is being portrayed as fact,” said Edward Felt’s brother, Gordon Felt [about the 44 blocks
He says he is insulted people would believe he would participate in anything
that honored his brother’s killers.
In The Church of Liberalism, Ann Coulter slammed the media for
granting the Jersey Girls an “absolute moral authority” card, not
questioning the Girls’ practice of blaming the Bush
administration instead of al Qaeda for their husband’s deaths on 9/11.
The Jersey Girls were bad enough, but nowhere is the flag of victim-hood
being used to cover up more bad behavior than at the Memorial Project.
Active cover-up of an ongoing Islamic supremacist plot
Like the Jersey Girls, the Memorial Project gives Islam a pass for 9/11.
Project members might not have known about the Mecca-orientation of the
Crescent of Embrace, but they DID know that it was a giant Islamic-shaped
crescent. Now they are doing far worse. Now they DO know that the giant
crescent points almost exactly at Mecca, and are consistently misleading the
press about it.
Their own Muslim consultant told them not to worry about the Mecca-oriented
that it can’t be seen as a mihrab (the Mecca-direction indicator
around which every mosque is built) unless it points EXACTLY at Mecca (a
claim that was contradicted
earlier this month by Saudi religious authorities).
So what does Project Supervisor Joanne Hanley say when asked
about the Mecca-orientation claim?
The only thing that orients
the memorial is the crash site.
They are actively and knowingly
covering up clear evidence of an ongoing al Qaeda sympathizing plot. Bad
To join our blogbursts, just send your blog’s url.